The Forums Are Now Closed!

The content will remain as a historical reference, thank you.

Where does the US's obsession with the free market come from?

By on January 26, 2010 5:24:58 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

As per the title.

 

Why does the word socialism in the US cause frothing at the mouth? Not comming from the US I don't understand this, I can see socialism and capitalism both have positive points as well as negative ones, but it seems crazy to me that when Obama talked of changing the healthcare system there were all these people protesting saying "Government hands off my health" and such.

 

After watching "Sicko" on TV the other night I think the average US person has little knowledge on socialism. I live in Australia with what would be called a "socialist" healthcare system and I think its great but we are not a socialist country.

 

So, without getting political, why is the culture of the United States of America so fixated on capitalism?

+22 Karma | 349 Replies
January 27, 2010 5:10:48 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Definition of Fascism: totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life

Take a look around Magicwill. I'm not sure what nation you hail from, but here in the US we're getting it rammed down our throats in the form of health care, "security", and many other forms that infringe on our inalienable rights.

You can call totalitarianism many things. One happened to be Fascism. One happened to be Nazism. One happened to be Communism. One happens to be Capitalism. One happens to be Socialism.

I think that in the grander scale of things, what we all need to look at is less of the form of government, and more at the corruption of that government.  Government is itself corrupt. That's almost the rule.

@ Darvin. I agree. Hitler was a genius when it came to turning the economy around. But the idiot had to go and slaughter millions. Part of him turning the economy around had a lot to do with scorning the Jewish owned banks and international bankers...which we all know how that wound up turning out. :/

The reason that so many people dislike socialism, is that it breeds dependency upon the government. While I was struggling several years ago to keep myself fed and warm, I witnessed a very well dressed woman move a stack--a STACK--of $20's and $100's in her purse to get to her welfare card.

A lot of people--myself included--correlate socialism to that of the welfare state. You remember this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg98BvqUvCc

 

Aside from outright stupidity, that is what that type of governance creates. Look at what has been done with the schools in the United States. We spend more per capita than any other country on education, and what do we get for it? We spend 5.7% of our GDP which happens to be about 23% of the entire world's GDP at $14.2Trillion. That's over $800billion on education.

http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=ny_gdp_mktp_cd&idim=country:USA&tdim=true&tstart=-315619200000&tunit=Y&tlen=48

We spend about as much on Education as the entire Soverign Nation of Turkey has for its entire national budget. There are probably 50+ countries that have a combined income/budget of less than half of our entire budget for education. It still isn't enough for us to educate our children according to those who run the system. But look! Despite an entire country's budget worth of educational funding, we are beaten out by 23% of the world's students in math and science amongst other scores.

As an American, I have felt like I was gyped in my education. The system is politicized when it should not be. Its supposed to be a system for being taught the basics and moving on to the more complex issues in life. I lost practically an entire year because several members of the staff at my highschool disliked my "attitude." Didn't matter I suppose (and supposed) that I was the good kid who didn't have unprotected sex with half the cheerleading squad, smoked marijuana, drank and operated an automobile, or any assortment of other things that the 'popular buttkiss' kids could get away with. My attitude was that of individuality and not following the societal norm. Individuality has been getting stifled in the American schools, which is a huge proponent on why our country is starting towards a downward spiral. Read The Underground History of American Education. http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/

All of this ties right back in with politics for one simple reason: A stupid society is a society that can be controlled. Two or three generations ago, our society would never have allowed half of the things that have occured today to ever happen. Four and Five generations ago, some of these things would have been acts of war between individual United States and the Federal Government. Some of these things that are being rammed down our throats are things that would have meant outright sedition. But it doesn't matter any more. We're dumb. We're fat. We're lazy. We're happy. ..And did I mention we're dumb?

Pulling this back to Socialism... I am terrified of it. What little bit of freedom I have in my country in the grand scale of things is being threatened by what people who refuse to lift their own weight will do to me personally.

I work. I pay taxes despite the fact that I hate them. Despite those taxes I work harder so that I can have more money to make due. Other people? They sit and eat off of my labor. They sit on their fat lazy asses and eat doritos and watch Fox News, or CNN, or whatever propaganda network they're in to. That is the socialism I despise. The other part of it is what folks in Canada and Britain are experiencing with Socialized healthcare--which explains why so many people fly here from overseas to get surgery.

January 27, 2010 5:13:09 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

It's this simple:  

Free market = give the companies all the power.  If the companies are corrupt, free market bad.

Socialism = give the government all the power.  If the government is corrupt, socialism bad.

 

Guess what:  in the USA, they're both corrupt.  You can argue free market vs. socialism all day, but in so doing you're going after the wrong thing.

January 27, 2010 5:17:33 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Your attitude is akin to comparing an Israeli kibbutz (the purest form of Communism) to Stalinist russia. Clearly the 2 are not the same in all respects, but both, at the core, preach community ownership of all property - communism.

It is a sad time when people try to rewrite history because it embarrasses them.

But Nazism and Socialism don't preach the same thing! Nazism didn't "branch" off socialism... it was just called "socialism" to appeal to nationalists and socialists.

The fact is if you're going to compare two groups by a single quality that they have in common, you are going to find relationships between every single group and Nazism, not just socialism. So Nazism and socialism are fond of government intervention... it is for completely different reasons and honestly socialism and nazism strongly, strongly diverge from there.

Socialism has had enough bad history without me trying to whitewash it. I can't hide the amount of blood that's been spilt in the name of socialism. But adding Hitler to that is unfair and more importantly untrue. Nazism being associated with socialism is mostly built off really vague associations.

January 27, 2010 5:17:47 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

The Nazi's were ecomonically popular. The Volkswagen was a good car. Germany as a state attempted genocide. Therefor all socialist systems result in people happy with their lot, driving around in cool cars and killing a group of people with similar genes?

 

Peoples Republic of China. China must be a place of political freedom for the average person because they are the PEOPLES Republic of China. They must allow some freedom in voting because they are the Peoples REPUBLIC of China (How many parties are there in China? How many appear on the ballot?). Names mean nothing, in fact the more a country uses words like "Peoples" and "Friendly" in their title the less people friendly they tend to be.

Is socialism the sign of a humane society? How else does a society take care of its own that have befallen a random setback (ie smashed onto the hood of a car that sped away, no insurance and between jobs at the time)?In the military its cool to have slogans like "Leave no-one behind!", in everyday life are ideals like that not valid?

January 27, 2010 5:24:45 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting MichaelCook,
The Nazi's were ecomonically popular. The Volkswagen was a good car. Germany as a state attempted genocide. Therefor all socialist systems result in people happy with their lot, driving around in cool cars and killing a group of people with similar genes?

 

Peoples Republic of China. China must be a place of political freedom for the average person because they are the PEOPLES Republic of China. They must allow some freedom in voting because they are the Peoples REPUBLIC of China (How many parties are there in China? How many appear on the ballot?). Names mean nothing, in fact the more a country uses words like "Peoples" and "Friendly" in their title the less people friendly they tend to be.

Is socialism the sign of a humane society? How else does a society take care of its own that have befallen a random setback (ie smashed onto the hood of a car that sped away, no insurance and between jobs at the time)?In the military its cool to have slogans like "Leave no-one behind!", in everyday life are ideals like that not valid?

That'd be all well and good if socialism only helped people who really needed help. Unfortunently, people are the problem as people abuse an imperfect system.

January 27, 2010 5:41:54 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

So you are saying that because some people abuse the system those who truely need it should go without?

 

How about with a free-market? Is there room for abuse there? Who suffers then and is that ok because its a dog eat dog world and its survival of the fittest?

 

I liked on Sicko the "I've got a Golden Ticket" bloke, the guy who "Loves his momma" for anyone who saw it. And yes Mike Moore is biased and sometimes a bit shonky, but playing the Golden ticket song from My Fair Lady with that bloke who while in government campaigned for laws to benefit the healthcare industry, then leaves government to go straight into a very well paying healthcare job.... classic.

 

*edit* it was not My Fair Lady, it was Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

January 27, 2010 5:43:21 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Leuthesius,
The Socialism that is trying to rear its head in the United States is that of a Nanny Welfare State, which really puts it more towards Communism than Socialism.

Not sure about it... for now, the socialism in US is enough soft... just need to care that it remain the "state at service of people" and don't become the "people at service of the state"...

Communism is Socialism run amock.

Agree... like in everything, extreme are not really good

I cannot deny that some of the countries in Europe have made it work

To my knowledge, all European country who was communist in the past have turn to the more soft version called socialism... same country like russia, ukraine or China have somehow put some capitalism in... socialism cannot work without money, trade, etc...

--but I will point out that a huge part of that reason is because they have a mutual defense treaty with the United States. So they don't have to spend that sort of money on a large military deterrent--thus they can spend it on social programs.

Being a ex-military, i can say that Us have only spend money when it was beneficial for them... don't know the situation now but in the past, it have happen that US don't pay his share of the NATO expense... that when NATO take a decision, if it don't please the US, they go their own way...

In fact, money spend on social programs in Europa are coming from the HUGE tax that we pay... now, i pay only 35% of tax due to my lower income but in the past, i have reach the 52.5% who is the maximum... and this is only the direct tax from state... city tax are between 5 and 10%... add what we call BTW ( TVA ) on all product sell ( around 21% here )...

Socialism gets us "wonderful programs" like Social Security. Which was a "nice idea" at first. Except that people have been getting money out of it that have never paid in.

It is because it is new in US... here, everybody who enjoy it have pay for it... or will pay for it... almost free education here will be repay once you work... when you work, you pay for health care, for pension but you will enjoy it later when you become older... in fact, it is not really different that private health insurance... only difference if that state don't need to return some big amount of interest to some share holders... in theory, the state system is better... i say in theorie because corruption take his share too...
 
All of that aside. My real opinion is that the military needs to "accidentally" drop a kinetic strike with a 1000 kg tungsten rod from orbit onto the Congress, SCOTUS, the White House, and all of the major lobbyist firms, and let the country hold a full re-election.

Will change nothing... problem is how work the elections... in US, it is a big multimedia show... there with the more money make the best show... Let say that tomorrow, there is again some election, that you wish to become President because you are a good guy and you can help any citizen Joe... What are your chance if you don't have any money...

Here campaign are boring... party receive money from state for the campaign... party are not allowed to spend more money that these allowed... No wild affiche everywhere... panel are installed for the election periode and each party have a equal surface... so, no holywood show, just a boring program that nobody believe... but any people have the same chance to reach the top... and business cannot lobby any candidat...

The USA hasn't had an actually good president since the Coup de etat when Kennedy was assassinated.

Will not really comment about it... same if you have a good president today, US citizen wish fast result... something almost impossible... first, you have the federal administration who is very slow to move, second you have some heavy international pressure and finaly some lobby who push their own agenda... A president is only a man and his power are somehow limited... try to push to hard and too fast, and you are killed like Kennedy... Kennedy was maybe a good president but what good thing can you make when you are dead ? Believe me, politic is really a dirty world and these who have the really power are these that we never see in the news !!!

January 27, 2010 5:51:32 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

That'd be all well and good if socialism only helped people who really needed help. Unfortunently, people are the problem as people abuse an imperfect system.

This reminds me of a cocktail-party solution I've had to this problem for a long time: why don't our corporate oligarchs just settle down and accept the cost of an adequate welfare state as a more efficient way of securing their business environment? Decent public housing is possible, and adequate doles will keep a majority of folks with low-to-no labour market value well enough fed, entertained, and tippled that they don't make serious trouble for anyone. I'm even a weird enough radical to think that the real 'cost' of going over a threshhold from transitional to lifetime aid should be sterilization (but then I want every woman to stop at one kid until the planet's back under 1 billion of us).

And I can sort of loop this back around to Michael's basic question. The US church of the free market is based in no small part on the fact that, generally speaking, someone of very humble origins can rise very far up the socioeconomic ladder. To people who want to make that climb, it is a sort of sin not to want to join them, whatever one's reasons might be. To people with some strains of progressivitis, we must all always want to help ourselves and others 'improve.' Mix those sorts of values with some mass production of consumer goods and a bit of modern media wizardry and you have folks effectively hooked and willing to speak of 'the free market' as if it was explicitly ordained by a superme deity, whether or not they ever read the Torah, Baghavad Gita, Bible, or Koran.

January 27, 2010 6:06:02 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

from what I could gather, US is just a very, very individualistic society. basically 'you are what you make of yourself'. if you are not successful, then you are not trying hard enough, that is how I understood their mind set. now, that has positive effects. an incredible freedom in which to prosper and create ideas, businesses, etc. but if you happen to have no particular talent or abilities, you are in trouble. no one will help you, because it's not their job to do so. ok. that's a bit over the top to characterise it, but I think I made my point.

January 27, 2010 6:31:22 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

your preety close... except, americans tend to send a shitton of monies go towards charities that in no way benifit them.

It could be in the form of food banks... or engineers without boarders, or whatever. A sizable portion of the USA GDP goes to charities, both inside the USA and outside.

The nice thing about charities... is that, instead of the big guy taking your monies and giving it to someone else (after taking off a sizeable portion to sustain the big guy), you get to choose where your money goes, and if you pick the right place, it can make a big difference.

January 27, 2010 6:32:01 PM from GalCiv II Forums GalCiv II Forums

Oh, Please!

Everyone has a talent or two, and everyone has abilities.

Thing is, some are simply too lazy to develop and use them. And the more socialistic a society is, the more the lazy ones are pandered to.

January 27, 2010 7:45:49 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

It the hats. Those giant fur hats. All americans envy them and wish they too lived in a place cold enough to justify wearing them. Since they can't, they must destroy the hats and everyone who wears them. Simple as that.

January 27, 2010 7:50:37 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

 

It's this simple:  

Free market = give the companies all the power.  If the companies are corrupt, free market bad.

Socialism = give the government all the power.  If the government is corrupt, socialism bad.


Guess what:  in the USA, they're both corrupt.  You can argue free market vs. socialism all day, but in so doing you're going after the wrong thing.

 

 

EXACTLY.

Burn them all down. Start fresh.

January 27, 2010 8:22:51 PM from Demigod Forums Demigod Forums

I'm sure everything will work out just fine now that corporations can finally channel as much money as they want into elections. This are going to turn a corner, I can feel it.

January 27, 2010 9:15:57 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

This is free trade propaganda.  Free trade is wiping out the American middle class.  Millions of good jobs are gone and will never come back.  Free trade is also destroying the dollar, because free trade is responsible for the accumulation of the massive trade deficit.  The only "amazing benefits" you speak of are to corporate CEO bonuses, and the Chinese.

 

Lines like this belong on SNL.

 

Millions of jobs are gone and will never come back because stupid companies and stupid unions have done stupid things.  Businesses die, it's a fact of life. When you make a car cost twice as much to make as it needs to because you're fucking stupid, you go out of business.  The sucking sound you hear when listening to the manufacturing base of this country will stop as soon as we stop paying a trained monkey six figures to push a button that doesn't need to exist in the first place.

 

The disappearing middle class is mythical bullshit.  The third quintile is better off and does half the work the second did thirty years ago.  When poor people are working two jobs and still can't afford a car, then you've got something to talk about.

 

Free trade has absolutely dick to do with the destruction of the dollar.  That is what happens when you have a trillion dollar deficit and you print money to pay for it.  The intrinsic value of money is just shy of zero, the more you print, the smaller the percentage of wealth each unit represents.  The eroding dollar is simple arithmatic, stop government spending from surpassing tax income and the problem ends.  The other two are at least propaganda spewed by union whores, this one came out of nowhere.

January 27, 2010 9:38:44 PM from Demigod Forums Demigod Forums

Psychoak knows what it's all about.  

January 27, 2010 10:50:28 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Mix those sorts of values with some mass production of consumer goods and a bit of modern media wizardry and you have folks effectively hooked and willing to speak of 'the free market' as if it was explicitly ordained by a superme deity, whether or not they ever read the Torah, Baghavad Gita, Bible, or Koran.

You know, the one thing I think is really harmful is how people believe that the free market is some sort of semi-ecological, self-correcting system that would work perfectly well if it was left well alone. To a certain extent this is absolutely true... but it's more like an ecosystem amorphous blobs eating each other and growing huge with each other blob they eat.

The economy is an institution... just like the government. It works because we all agree that it works... a consensus (oh noes! collectivization!) If the recent crash proved absolutely anything, it's that even the industry leaders are influenced enough by culture and faith in the free market to make some pretty awful decisions.

It's not that I don't blame the government. I completely blame the government. It was their job to put the reins on the market and to slow down all the enormous amounts of speculation. I can't blame the corporations, these companies do exactly what we'd expect them to do: make a profit. Because our economy rewards short-term speculation, we got exactly that.

Summary: the economy is made of humans, therefore not a perfect system. And like every other system, it should have some oversight.

I'm sure everything will work out just fine now that corporations can finally channel as much money as they want into elections. This are going to turn a corner, I can feel it.

This is the worst thing to happen. Ever.

January 27, 2010 10:56:19 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Go study Chile, there is such a thing as privatized social security.  Chile was one of the early modern nations to implement modern socialist social security and one of the first to go broke as a result.  The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of OTHER peoples money.

Let's sum up how socialism works.  You take from party A, give to party ME, and tell everyone it is going to party yoU.

January 27, 2010 11:36:44 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Leuthesius,

Free market = give the companies all the power.  If the companies are corrupt, free market bad.

Socialism = give the government all the power.  If the government is corrupt, socialism bad.

Guess what:  in the USA, they're both corrupt.  You can argue free market vs. socialism all day, but in so doing you're going after the wrong thing.

Indeed, though I don't think destroying the system altogether is quite necissary yet. In modern society, there is three main groups that have the power. Businesses, Government, and Taxpayers/Voters. In all cases, each benefits the most if they can play the other two against each other. Currently, Government and Business seem to be working together quite a lot (at taxpayer expense), but it has hardly a new thing in American history. In time this will reverse in one way or the other, the real factor is how much damage is done in the mean time.

Also, I find it interesting how often the U.S. and corrupt has come up. I won't say it is not true, but I don't think it's a whole lot worse than it has been before, and it sure is a lot less than many other countries. The main difference is the amount of money we're talking about, which has increased exponentially.

Indeed, though really it's n

Quoting Splitshadow,
Psychoak knows what it's all about.  

January 27, 2010 11:38:53 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Leuthesius,

@ Darvin. I agree. Hitler was a genius when it came to turning the economy around. But the idiot had to go and slaughter millions. Part of him turning the economy around had a lot to do with scorning the Jewish owned banks and international bankers...which we all know how that wound up turning out. :/

Hitler would've gone down as a history as a great man if he didn't invade France. Before then, Britain and France were essentially allowing Germany to conquer and extend its borders, and the Holocaust was doubted in the western world. If Hitler just stopped his conquests then, we might of seen him in a much more positive light, especially if the genocides were covered up.

And of course, we give little thought to Stalin's purges or the genocides under Imperial Japan, even though both were far more costly in terms of lives than the Holocaust. :/

Back onto the subject, the American free market is a symbol of our culture. The United States' promotion of individualism seems rather unique in the modern world.

January 27, 2010 11:46:24 PM from Demigod Forums Demigod Forums

Since we brought up education....

My view is this, How many people will it take to invent the next superweapon? (Think bigger than nuclear) Since this is all theoretical I'll say 10,000 (This includes previous scientific discoveries that lead up to it after teh invention of the atom bomb blah blah blah) anyway those 10,000 people represent less than 1% of the population, but they will create an invention that will affect the lives of BILLIONS of people (could be good or bad), but in America instead of trying to find and educate the people who are either smart enough, or willing to put in enough effort to create those inventions or simply use our current knowledge effectively, we spend money catering to people too stupid or too lazy to learn these things. Now I don't have facts or anything just my personal experience in an American school, but all I've seen is people take their education and what it offers for granted instead focusing on "ZOMG DID YOU HEAR ABOUT X HOOKING UP WITH Y!!!!!!!!!!". For example, where I live they were considering cutting the majority of funding to advanced students to better help disabled students when it was already split 50/50, and according to the bell curve that will be the same split in the # of people considered bright... I don't mean to appear as though I have something against disabled students ,but i think that this idea that everyone in America should receive equal results from the education system, no matter what they do, is wrong. Equal opportunity != Equal results.

Hmm I think this thread has officially been derailed.

 

January 28, 2010 12:01:41 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

The only threads that don't become derailed are the "Game" threads. And thats because there is something to win which keeps your eyes on the ball.

 

Quoting RogueCaptain,
Go study Chile, there is such a thing as privatized social security.  Chile was one of the early modern nations to implement modern socialist social security and one of the first to go broke as a result.  The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of OTHER peoples money.

 

Well if you want to give ALL the money away of course you go broke. But what about a healthcare system in the US? Are you saying that it by itself will bankrupt the US? What if limits are put on the assistance given?

 

What I read from your message is that you have not really thought about socialism but are dead set against socialism for it being socialism. And thats what is thread is discussing so thread back on track.

 

 

*edit* reading that it sounds a bit harsh and I didn't mean it to be. If I were to say "Lets 100% socialise everything in the US" I can understand you opinion. But not everything needs to be socialised. Here in Aus we have both public and private hospitals, so business successfully competes with the public system and if people can't afford the private system they have a fall back. Also how about some socialism of the healthcare by having government subsiding of cancer specific medicine. Nobody can scam that, either you have cancer or you don't and if you don't have cancer why do you want drugs that will make your hair fall out and vomit? Why is socialism so bad?

January 28, 2010 12:20:28 AM from Demigod Forums Demigod Forums

Quoting Leuthesius,
 


It's this simple:  

Free market = give the companies all the power.  If the companies are corrupt, free market bad.

Socialism = give the government all the power.  If the government is corrupt, socialism bad.




Guess what:  in the USA, they're both corrupt.  You can argue free market vs. socialism all day, but in so doing you're going after the wrong thing.

 

 

EXACTLY.

Burn them all down. Start fresh.

What you won't is that new world order crap which is just as corrupt. There is no perfect government system and their never will be.

January 28, 2010 12:23:59 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting MichaelCook,

Well if you want to give ALL the money away of course you go broke. But what about a healthcare system in the US? Are you saying that it by itself will bankrupt the US? What if limits are put on the assistance given?

Oh it by itself won't bankrupt the US. The ten trillion dollar debt we've accumulated on the War on Terror, other social programs, and general irresponsible (certain bailouts) spending on top of a healthcare bill is what would possibly bankrupt the US. Now if we were somehow had a budget surplus, I might understand the concept (though I'd rather pay the chinese some of their money back first), but a massive increase in social spending doesn't seem like a wise thing to do in a recession or right after a recession.

Granted, the US government is already paying a lot of its citizens health care (especially since medicare part D), and some reform to how it does so should be welcome. However, I don't think the government should increase its liabilities beyond what it is now without tax increases, and that's only if the increased liabilities are worth protecting, which based on a recent track record I doubt they will be.

January 28, 2010 12:33:04 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

There's only one "perfect" government. That's a government that doesn't exist.

Stardock Forums v1.0.0.0    #108434  walnut1   Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000281   Page Render Time:

Stardock Magazine | Register | Online Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Copyright ?? 2012 Stardock Entertainment and Gas Powered Games. Demigod is a trademark of Gas Powered Games. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and copyrights are the properties of their respective owners. Windows, the Windows Vista Start button and Xbox 360 are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies, and 'Games for Windows' and the Windows Vista Start button logo are used under license from Microsoft. ?? 2012 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.