Sorry to step on toes Aldarian, it wasn't my intent.
Try to use Google Maps or Goggle Earh.
Germany is in the middle Europe.
I dont know exactly which country you mean, but that isnt germany at all.
I'm sorry, I don't seem to see what this has to do outside an inaccuracy or bug in those software packages. I'm not referring to old Germany, in case that's what you infer.
Ah and how it is going in Guantanamo? ('guilty unless proven' ha!)
I'll set aside my ethnocentrism if you will, Aldarian. You assume that because I'm American that I applaud, or approve, of Guantanamo. It started as suspected terrorists during a time of war, this was back when we were retaliating against Afghanistan--even though war wasn't declared. When it didn't stop there I think everyone I knew became wary and suspicious of Guantanamo. The point was to temporarily hold the possible terrorists until the Taliban was overthrown, bureaucracy again overstepped its bounds.
The military and intelligence "wings" of the government don't report to me. I'm just a civilian. But so far as I know things are much better than they were. In my own personal opinion those individuals involved in the torture and those responsible for the orders should have been quickly court marshaled and shot
--but we're too "humane" for that aren't we?
That's not the point. In the last fifty years the United States has been a totalitarian state represented by only professional
politicians who lobby for fringe interest, usually on behalf of huge corporations like Monsanto. That's why I support men and women like Ron Paul.
If you dont know it, dont make any suggestions because you hear things.
You dont know mutch about germany... and it makes me sad that people really think that this is true.
If you think rumors or opinions don't sway opinion please think again. It is hard to tell what is smoke and what is real anymore. Would you enlighten me to what the current state of Germany is? Whether it is police state or otherwise, and how the ban against swastika's and Nazi symbols apply to that? I am curious, and yet you make no attempt to even set the record straight. That does disappoint me since you give me nothing to correct in my knowledge save that it could be inaccurate for unstated reasons. Kinda hard to assimilate in that manner.
In fact, there is no charge any more. It was withdrawn on thursday or friday.
That's good news.
I wondered how the legal advise the woman had helped her decide to put that forward, it seemed kinda silly to me.
The goverment cant define anything as a threat, there are several instances which must allow the goverment to do such a thing and if even one thinks/mentions that there is no threat, nothing will be changed.
Excellent point! The government is there to protect the populace and enforce law, at its basest definition. But one cannot help but wonder at certain proposed threats you know.
There was a law here in a state some time ago, I no longer remember which state, where a woman could not drive a car without her husband sitting on the hood with a shotgun to warn off anyone in the way. Pfeh, politicians!